Kratom Lawsuits & 7-OH Class Actions

In re: Feel Free Wellness Tonic Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation

Defendants: Botanic Tonics, LLC

Plaintiffs: Consumers of Feel Free Wellness Tonic

An $8.75 million settlement was reached over claims that the 'Feel Free' tonic was marketed as a safe alcohol alternative without disclosing it contained kratom and was highly addictive. This case set a precedent for marketing liability in the kratom industry.

J.J. v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Plaintiffs: J.J.

Consumer protection lawsuit alleging that Ashlynn Marketing Group failed to disclose the highly addictive nature of its kratom extract products. A federal judge denied the company's motion to dismiss in late 2024, allowing the case to proceed on theories of fraud and failure to warn about physical dependence risks.

J.J. v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Plaintiffs: J.J.

Plaintiffs allege they became addicted to kratom products because the packaging and advertising failed to disclose the addictive potential. A federal court allowed California state claims to proceed after a partial dismissal in early 2025.

Simmons v. [Kratom Manufacturer]

Defendants: Unnamed Kratom Manufacturer and Distributor

Plaintiffs: Family of Robert Simmons

Wrongful death lawsuit filed after a 34-year-old man died of acute kratom toxicity. The suit alleges the manufacturer failed to warn consumers of the risks and marketed the product as a safe, natural supplement.

Estate of Robert Simmons v. [Kratom Manufacturer/Distributor]

Defendants: Unspecified Kratom Manufacturer and Retailer

Plaintiffs: Family of Robert Simmons

A lawsuit filed following the death of a 34-year-old Colorado man attributed to acute kratom toxicity. The suit alleges the manufacturer marketed the product as a safe, natural supplement while failing to provide adequate safety information or warnings.

M.A. et al. v. Thang Botanicals, Inc.

Defendants: Thang Botanicals, Inc.

Plaintiffs: M.A. and others

A class action alleging that 7OHMZ kratom products (7-hydroxymitragynine tablets) were deceptively marketed as safe and natural while lacking adequate warnings about their high potential for physical and psychological dependence. The court recently narrowed the claims but allowed the case to proceed on theories of fraud.

Estate of Robert Simmons v. [Kratom Manufacturer]

Defendants: Kratom Manufacturer and Distributor

Plaintiffs: Family of Robert Simmons

Wrongful death lawsuit filed after a 34-year-old man died from acute kratom toxicity. The suit alleges the manufacturer failed to provide adequate safety information and marketed the product as a safe, natural remedy.

Matthew Kernisky v. Kama Distribution LLC

Defendants: Kama Distribution LLC

Plaintiffs: Matthew Kernisky

This class action targets the sale of 7-OH and Mitragynine Pseudoindoxyl tablets. The plaintiff alleges the products contain alkaloid levels significantly more potent than morphine and that the defendant failed to warn of the extreme addiction and withdrawal risks associated with these semi-synthetic kratom derivatives.

Matthew Kernisky v. Kama Distribution LLC

Defendants: Kama Distribution LLC

Plaintiffs: Matthew Kernisky

This class action targets 'artificially derived' 7-OH and Pseudoindoxyl tablets. The plaintiff alleges the products contain alkaloid concentrations significantly more potent than morphine and that the manufacturer failed to disclose the risks of severe addiction and enhanced withdrawal symptoms.

Matthew Kernisky v. Kama Distribution LLC

Defendants: Kama Distribution LLC

Plaintiffs: Matthew Kernisky

This class action targets the sale of artificially derived 7-OH kratom products, alleging they are marketed as safe, natural supplements despite containing potent alkaloids like Pseudoindoxyl and 7-OH at levels far higher than raw kratom, leading to unforeseen addiction.

Matthew Kernisky v. Kama Distribution LLC

Defendants: Kama Distribution LLC

Plaintiffs: Matthew Kernisky

A lawsuit alleging that the defendant's Mitragynine Pseudoindoxyl and 7-OH tablets contain alkaloid concentrations significantly more potent than morphine, marketed deceptively as harmless herbal remedies.

Korte and Ray v. CBD American Shaman LLC et al.

Defendants: CBD American Shaman LLC, Stephen Vincent Sanders II, SVS Enterprises LLC, Shaman Botanicals

Plaintiffs: Edward Zachary Korte and Steven Ray

Plaintiffs allege that American Shaman’s 'Advanced Alkaloid' tablets contain 7-OH and were misrepresented as a safe herbal remedy or dietary supplement despite being a highly addictive substance with opioid-like effects.

Edward Zachary Korte and Steven Ray v. CBD American Shaman LLC

Defendants: CBD American Shaman LLC, Stephen Vincent Sanders II, SVS Enterprises LLC, Shaman Botanicals

Plaintiffs: Edward Zachary Korte and Steven Ray

The lawsuit alleges that 'Advanced Alkaloid' tablets were misrepresented as herbal remedies or dietary supplements despite containing 7-OH, a highly addictive substance. The case follows FDA warning letters regarding the safety and marketing of these concentrated products.

Edward Zachary Korte, et al. v. CBD American Shaman LLC, et al.

Defendants: CBD American Shaman LLC, Shaman Botanicals LLC, SVS Enterprises LLC, Vince Sanders

Plaintiffs: Edward Zachary Korte and Steven Ray

A class action alleging a racketeering (RICO) scheme involving the deceptive marketing of 'Advanced Alkaloids' 7-OH tablets. The plaintiffs claim the company targeted vulnerable individuals seeking pain relief with highly addictive products while concealing withdrawal risks.

Edward Zachary Korte and Steven Ray v. CBD American Shaman LLC, et al.

Defendants: CBD American Shaman LLC, Shaman Botanicals, Stephen Vincent Sanders II

Plaintiffs: Edward Zachary Korte and Steven Ray

A class action alleging RICO violations and misrepresentation of 'Advanced Alkaloid' tablets containing 7-OH as natural supplements, claiming they are highly addictive and lack proper safety evaluations or warnings.

Korte and Ray v. CBD American Shaman LLC, et al.

Defendants: CBD American Shaman LLC, Stephen Vincent Sanders II, SVS Enterprises LLC, Shaman Botanicals

Plaintiffs: Korte and Ray

A class action alleging that the 'Advanced Alkaloid' tablets contain 7-OH misrepresented as an herbal remedy. The complaint includes allegations of RICO violations, unjust enrichment, and violations of state consumer protection laws due to the highly addictive nature of the products.

M.A. et al. v. Thang Botanicals, Inc.

Defendants: Thang Botanicals, Inc. (dba 7OHMZ)

Plaintiffs: M.A. and other consumers

A federal class action lawsuit targeting the marketing of '7OHMZ' 7-hydroxymitragynine tablets. The plaintiffs allege the company falsely marketed the products as safe, plant-derived supplements while failing to disclose their highly addictive, opioid-like properties. The court recently denied a motion to dismiss, allowing the case to proceed on fraud and omission theories.

M.A. et al. v. Thang Botanicals, Inc.

Defendants: Thang Botanicals, Inc.

Plaintiffs: M.A. and other consumers

A class action lawsuit alleging that 7OHMZ kratom tablets, which feature high concentrations of 7-hydroxymitragynine, were deceptively marketed as safe and natural while lacking adequate warnings regarding their high potential for addiction and withdrawal.

Investigations into MGM-15 Adulterated Products

Defendants: Various kratom extract manufacturers (e.g., Shaman Botanicals)

Plaintiffs: Affected consumers represented by specialized law firms (e.g., mctlaw, Lanier Law Firm)

Emerging litigation and mass tort investigations focused on products containing MGM-15 (dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine) and MGM-16. These semi-synthetic alkaloids are significantly more potent than 7-OH and were detected in commercially available tablets in late 2025. Lawsuits allege these products are sold as 'research chemicals' or 'kratom' without FDA approval or safety warnings.

J.J. v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Plaintiffs: J.J. and other consumers

Class action lawsuit alleging false advertising and product liability regarding Krave Botanicals kratom products. Plaintiffs argue they were not warned about the products' addictive potential; a September 2024 court opinion allowed the case to proceed past early dismissal stages.

A.S. et al. v. Thang Botanicals Inc. and FTLS Holdings LLC

Defendants: Thang Botanicals Inc., FTLS Holdings LLC

Plaintiffs: A.S. and other consumers

Class action lawsuit alleging that the manufacturers of 7-OH kratom tablets (7OHMZ) marketed highly addictive substances as non-addictive pain-relieving supplements without disclosure of risks or proper addiction warnings.

M.A. et al. v. Thang Botanicals, Inc. and FTLS Holdings, LLC

Defendants: Thang Botanicals, Inc. and FTLS Holdings, LLC (d/b/a 7OHMZ)

Plaintiffs: M.A., A.S., N.A., and J.R.

A class action lawsuit alleging that the manufacturers of 7OHMZ tablets deceptively marketed 7-OH kratom products as safe herbal supplements while concealing their extreme addiction potential and opioid-like withdrawal effects. Plaintiffs allege the products are pure isolates significantly more potent than traditional kratom.

A.S. et al. v. Thang Botanicals Inc. and FTLS Holdings LLC

Defendants: Thang Botanicals Inc.; FTLS Holdings LLC

Plaintiffs: A.S. and other consumers

Class action lawsuit alleging that the manufacturers capitalized on the addictive properties of kratom by refining and selling a rarefied form of the psychoactive ingredient 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) to consumers without adequate warnings about its potency or addiction risks.

J.T., et al. v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc. (d/b/a Krave Kratom)

Plaintiffs: J.T., J.B., and D.F. (Anonymous plaintiffs)

A civil class action alleging false, misleading, and negligent sales practices regarding Krave Kratom powder, capsules, and extracts. Plaintiffs allege the company failed to warn about the addictive, opioid-like nature of its products.

M.A. et al. v. Thang Botanicals, Inc. d/b/a 7-OHMZ

Defendants: Thang Botanicals, Inc. and FTLS Holdings LLC

Plaintiffs: M.A., A.S., et al.

This lawsuit targets 7-OHMZ tablets, alleging they are marketed as safe, plant-based supplements while containing concentrated 7-hydroxymitragynine. The plaintiffs claim the products lack adequate addiction warnings and caused them to suffer severe physical and psychological withdrawal symptoms.

M.A. et al. v. Thang Botanicals, Inc. and FTLS Holdings

Defendants: Thang Botanicals, Inc. and FTLS Holdings

Plaintiffs: M.A. and others (Consumers)

A consumer class action alleging that the defendants sold 7-OH kratom tablets without adequate addiction warnings. The lawsuit claims the companies made the tablets appear to be safe, natural supplements while hiding the significant risk of dependency associated with concentrated 7-OH products.

Consumers v. Thang Botanicals and FTLS Holdings

Defendants: Thang Botanicals and FTLS Holdings

Plaintiffs: Individual consumers

Plaintiffs sued Thang Botanicals and FTLS Holdings for selling 7-OH kratom tablets without addiction warnings. The suit alleges the companies designed the products to appear safe while hiding the high risk of addiction and physical illness.

M.A. et al. v. Thang Botanicals Inc. d/b/a 7OHMZ

Defendants: Thang Botanicals Inc. (d/b/a 7-OHMZ), FTLS Holdings LLC

Plaintiffs: M.A., A.S., N.A., and J.R.

Alleges false, misleading, and negligent sales practices regarding 7-OH tablets. Plaintiffs claim the products were sold without adequate warnings about their addictive nature and that samples were distributed to signal safety.

M.A. et al. v. Thang Botanicals, Inc. and FTLS Holdings

Defendants: Thang Botanicals, Inc., FTLS Holdings

Plaintiffs: M.A. and others

Plaintiffs allege the defendants sold 7-OH kratom tablets without adequate addiction warnings, misleadingly presenting them as safe while hiding significant health risks.

Dustin Hernandez v. Whole Herbs Kratom, et al.

Defendants: Jacob Fletcher, Shaman Supplies, LLC, Kono Labs, Whole Herbs Kratom, Perfection in Peace, LLC, and Chaney's Tobacco Station, Inc.

Plaintiffs: Family of Dustin Hernandez

Wrongful death lawsuit filed after a 29-year-old man died from a seizure linked to acute mitragynine intoxication after drinking 'Whole Herbs' kratom tea. The suit alleges the products were marketed as safe alternatives for chronic pain and anxiety without adequate warnings.

Estate of Krystal Talavera v. Grow LLC d/b/a The Kratom Distro

Defendants: Grow LLC (The Kratom Distro) and Sean Michael Harder

Plaintiffs: Family of Krystal Talavera

In a landmark 2023 ruling, a federal judge awarded $11.6 million to the family of a Florida mother who died from acute mitragynine intoxication after using a product called 'Space Dust.' The court found the vendor liable for failing to warn consumers about the risks of the concentrated extract, which was marketed as a safe supplement.

State of Missouri ex rel. Catherine L. Hanaway v. CBD American Shaman LLC et al.

Defendants: CBD American Shaman LLC, Shaman Botanicals LLC, and associated web of companies

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri

Part of a broader investigation into kratom retailers, this lawsuit alleges that CBD American Shaman sold 7-OH products without disclosing their addictive potential and provided 'free samples' to consumers to encourage dependency. The state claims the products are unapproved drugs marketed as harmless supplements.

K.T., B.M., et al. v. State of Florida

Defendants: State of Florida / Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services

Plaintiffs: K.T., B.M., J.E., A.G., A.R., M.D., The Mystic Grove LLC, and Green Brothers Wholesale

A group of consumers and retailers filed a petition to overturn Florida's emergency rule that classified isolated 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) as a Schedule I controlled substance. The plaintiffs argue the state bypassed due process and that 7-OH is a natural component of kratom already regulated by state law.

The Mystic Grove LLC et al. v. Florida Attorney General

Defendants: State of Florida

Plaintiffs: The Mystic Grove LLC, Green Brothers Wholesale, and individual consumers

A lawsuit filed by kratom industry members and consumers to overturn Florida's emergency ban on 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) products, arguing the ban was issued without due process and that 7-OH is a natural part of kratom.

K.T. et al. v. Florida State Board of Pharmacy

Defendants: Florida State Board of Pharmacy / State of Florida

Plaintiffs: K.T., B.M., J.E., and various small businesses (Mystic Grove LLC)

Administrative challenge seeking to overturn Florida's emergency ban that classified isolated and concentrated 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) as a Schedule I controlled substance. The petitioners argue the emergency rule was issued without public notice or due process and criminalizes a product used by thousands for wellness.

K.T. et al. v. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier

Defendants: State of Florida

Plaintiffs: K.T., B.M., J.E., A.G., A.R., M.D., The Mystic Grove LLC, Green Brothers Wholesale

An industry group and several individuals sued the state of Florida to overturn an emergency ban that classified isolated and concentrated 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) as a Schedule I controlled substance without a public hearing or notice.

Mystic Grove LLC et al. v. State of Florida

Defendants: State of Florida / Florida Department of Health

Plaintiffs: The Mystic Grove LLC, Green Brothers Wholesale, and individual consumers (K.T., B.M., J.E., etc.)

A legal challenge filed by kratom businesses and consumers seeking to overturn Florida's emergency rule that classified 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) as a Schedule I controlled substance. The petitioners argue the order was issued without public notice and criminalized a natural alkaloid found in the kratom plant.

State of Missouri ex rel. Attorney General v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (d/b/a EDP Kratom), Dustin Robinson, and others

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri

The Missouri Attorney General filed suit against EDP Kratom for the unlawful manufacture and sale of products containing Mitragynine, 7-OH, and the potent semi-synthetic opioid MGM-15 (dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine). The petition alleges the company failed to disclose dangerous active ingredients, downplayed withdrawal risks, and marketed unregulated substances as safe to Missouri consumers.

State of Missouri ex rel. Catherine L. Hanaway v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC d/b/a EDP Kratom, et al.

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom), Dustin Robinson, Ajaykumar Patel, Joe Gallagher

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri

The Missouri Attorney General filed this lawsuit targeting the manufacture and sale of high-potency kratom alkaloids 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) and MGM-15 (dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine). The state alleges that MGM-15 is a synthetic derivative approximately 15 times more potent than morphine. The defendants are accused of failing to disclose dangerous ingredients, downplaying addiction risks, and engaging in deceptive marketing practices by selling these compounds as 'safe' alternatives without regulatory approval.

State of Missouri v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC d/b/a EDP Kratom

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom)

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri (Attorney General Katherine Hanaway)

The Missouri Attorney General filed a lawsuit against the makers of EDP Kratom, alleging the company illegally manufactures and sells synthetic opioids, specifically 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) and MGM-15, in gas stations and smoke shops. The petition claims the company fails to disclose dangerous ingredients and lacks proper testing and warning labels, violating the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act.

State of Missouri et al. v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC d/b/a EDP Kratom, et al.

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom), Robinson, Patel, and Gallagher

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri (Attorney General Catherine Hanaway)

The Missouri Attorney General filed a lawsuit against the makers of EDP Kratom for allegedly selling high-potency synthetic kratom alkaloids, specifically 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) and MGM-15 (dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine). The suit claims these products are marketed as safe dietary supplements while functioning as potent opioids, failing to warn consumers about addiction, withdrawal, and overdose risks.

State of Missouri ex rel., Attorney General v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC d/b/a EDP Kratom, et al.

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom), Dustin Robinson, Ajaykumar Patel, Joe Gallagher

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri

Lawsuit alleging the unlawful manufacturing and sale of kratom alkaloids including 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) and dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine (MGM-15). The state alleges these are unapproved new drugs and that the company failed to disclose risks of addiction, withdrawal, and overdose while deceptively marketing them as safe alternatives to opioids.

State of Missouri ex rel. Catherine L. Hanaway v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC d/b/a EDP Kratom

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom); Dustin Robinson; Ajaykumar Patel; Joe Gallagher

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri; Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services

The Missouri Attorney General filed suit for the unlawful manufacture and sale of synthetic opioids, specifically naming 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) and the even more potent derivative MGM-15 (dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine), alleging failure to disclose ingredients and addiction risks.

State of Missouri and Department of Health and Senior Services v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC, et al.

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom), Dustin Robinson, Joe Gallagher

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri (Attorney General Catherine Hanaway)

The Missouri Attorney General filed suit alleging that the defendants manufactured and sold dangerous kratom alkaloids, including 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) and the synthetic derivative MGM-15, without regulatory approval. The lawsuit claimed the products were marketed as safe while downplaying risks of addiction and overdose. A settlement was reached on June 10, 2026, where the defendants agreed to suspend all sales of these compounds in Missouri.

State of Missouri ex rel. Attorney General v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC d/b/a EDP Kratom, et al.

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom), Dustin Robinson, Ajaykumar Patel, and Joe Gallagher

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri

The Missouri Attorney General filed a lawsuit targeting the manufacture and sale of synthetic kratom derivatives including mitragynine, 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH), and dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine (MGM-15). The petition alleges the defendants sold these potent opioids without required safety testing or regulatory approval and deceptively claimed they were safe alternatives to prescription painkillers.

State of Missouri v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC d/b/a EDP Kratom

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom)

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri (Attorney General Catherine Hanaway)

The Missouri Attorney General filed a lawsuit against EDP Kratom for the unlawful manufacture and sale of products containing kratom alkaloids, specifically highlighting the synthetic derivative MGM-15 (dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine), which is described as 15 times more potent than morphine. The suit alleges the company failed to disclose dangerous ingredients and downplayed risks of addiction and overdose.

State of Missouri v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom)

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom)

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri (Attorney General)

A state-led lawsuit targeting the unlawful manufacturing and sale of kratom alkaloids Mitragynine, 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH), and dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine (MGM-15). The petition alleges the company sold these highly potent synthetic opioids in gas stations and smoke shops without safety testing, age verification, or adequate risk disclosures.

State of Missouri ex rel. Attorney General Catherine L. Hanaway v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC d/b/a EDP Kratom

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom), Robinson, Patel, and Gallagher

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri

This enforcement action targets the manufacturer and distributor of EDP Kratom products for selling highly potent alkaloids including mitragynine, 7-OH, and MGM-15. The lawsuit claims these substances are sold without mandatory safety testing or regulatory approval and are misleadingly marketed without adequate warnings regarding addiction and withdrawal risks.

State of Missouri v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom)

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom), Dustin Robinson, Ajaykumar Patel

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri (Attorney General Catherine Hanaway)

The Missouri Attorney General filed suit alleging the illegal manufacture and sale of 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) and dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine (MGM-15) products. The complaint asserts these substances are hazardous synthetic opioids marketed without safety testing or regulatory approval, often sold without age verification and downplaying addiction risks.

State of Missouri ex rel. Attorney General v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC d/b/a EDP Kratom, et al.

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom), Dustin Robinson, Ajaykumar Patel, and Joe Gallagher

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri

A state enforcement action alleging the unlawful manufacture and sale of high-potency kratom alkaloids, specifically 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) and the semi-synthetic derivative MGM-15. The lawsuit claims these substances are marketed as safe despite having opioid-like effects and significant addiction risks.

State of Missouri ex rel. Catherine Hanaway v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (d/b/a EDP Kratom)

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom)

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri (Office of the Attorney General)

Lawsuit alleging the unlawful manufacture and sale of synthetic opioids marketed as kratom. The complaint specifically targets products containing Mitragynine, 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH), and dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine (MGM-15), noting that MGM-15 is approximately 15 times more potent than morphine and poses significant risks of addiction and overdose.

In re: Botanic Tonics LLC Kratom Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation

Defendants: Botanic Tonics LLC

Plaintiffs: Consumers of Feel Free tonics

Botanic Tonics agreed to an $8.75 million settlement to resolve claims that it failed to disclose the presence and risks of kratom in its 'Feel Free' drink. Plaintiffs alleged the product was marketed as a safe kava-based tonic while containing addictive levels of kratom, leading to dependency and severe withdrawal symptoms.

In re: Feel Free Kratom/Kava Class Action Litigation

Defendants: Botanic Tonics LLC

Plaintiffs: Consumers of Feel Free tonic

Botanic Tonics agreed to an $8.75 million settlement to resolve claims that its 'Feel Free' tonic was marketed as a safe wellness drink while failing to disclose its highly addictive kratom content and the associated risks of severe withdrawal. The settlement follows numerous reports of consumers becoming addicted to the product.

Estate of Caleb Sturgis v. [Kratom Retailers/Manufacturers]

Defendants: Various kratom vendors and manufacturers

Plaintiffs: Family of Caleb Sturgis

A wrongful death lawsuit alleging that Caleb Sturgis died from a heart attack directly linked to his use of kratom products. The lawsuit focuses on the lack of proper labeling, dosage instructions, and the failure of vendors to warn about serious cardiac risks associated with mitragynine consumption.

People of the State of California v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc. (doing business as Krave, Krave Kratom, and Krave Botanicals)

Plaintiffs: State of California (Department of Public Health and Attorney General Rob Bonta)

California regulators sued the company for the illegal manufacture and distribution of kratom-derived products including 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH). The suit alleges the company tampered with embargoed goods and continued shipping products despite multiple notices of violation.

Romandine v. Botanic Tonics, LLC

Defendants: Botanic Tonics, LLC

Plaintiffs: Consumers of 'Feel Free' products

Botanic Tonics agreed to an $8.75 million settlement in a class action lawsuit alleging that the company failed to disclose that its 'Feel Free' kratom and kava tonic was highly addictive. The lawsuit claimed the company marketed the product to individuals struggling with addiction without warning them of the potential for dependency and overdose.

Feel Free Kratom Class Action Settlement

Defendants: Botanic Tonics LLC

Plaintiffs: Consumers of 'Feel Free' tonics

Botanic Tonics agreed to pay $8.75 million to settle a class action alleging it failed to disclose the quantity of kratom in its 'Feel Free' products and minimized addiction risks. The suit claimed the product was marketed as a wellness tonic to people struggling with addiction, while being highly addictive itself.

Botanic Tonics LLC Class Action Settlement

Defendants: Botanic Tonics LLC

Plaintiffs: Consumer Class

A multi-million dollar settlement regarding the 'Feel Free Wellness Tonic.' The lawsuit alleged the company marketed the kratom-kava mix as a safe alcohol alternative while failing to disclose its highly addictive nature and potential health risks.

M.A. et al. v. Thang Botanicals, Inc.

Defendants: Thang Botanicals, Inc. (d/b/a 7OHMZ); FTLS Holdings LLC

Plaintiffs: M.L., A.S., N.A., and J.R.

Class action targeting the marketing of 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) tablets. After an involuntary dismissal in the Northern District of California in April 2025, the case is currently under appeal.

The People of the State of California v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc. (d/b/a Krave Kratom, Krave Botanicals)

Plaintiffs: State of California (Department of Public Health & Attorney General Rob Bonta)

Lawsuit alleging the illegal manufacture and distribution of kratom and its derivative 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH). The state claims the company violated a government-ordered embargo and continued to sell adulterated products despite public health risks linked to multiple overdose deaths.

State of Missouri v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom)

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom), Dustin Robinson

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri

The Missouri Attorney General filed suit against EDP Kratom for the unlawful manufacture and sale of products containing Mitragynine, 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH), and the highly potent synthetic derivative dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine (MGM-15). The lawsuit alleges the company used misleading claims, failed to disclose dangerous active ingredients, and did not warn consumers about addiction, withdrawal, or overdose risks.

State of Missouri v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom)

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (d/b/a EDP Kratom)

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri

The Missouri Attorney General filed suit against EDP Kratom for the manufacture and sale of products containing Mitragynine, 7-OH, and MGM-15 (dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine). The suit alleges the company marketed these synthetic derivatives without safety testing, failed to disclose dangerous ingredients, and downplayed addiction and overdose risks.

State of Missouri v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (d/b/a EDP Kratom)

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom)

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri

The Missouri Attorney General filed suit alleging the company manufactured and sold kratom products containing highly potent synthetic derivatives, specifically 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) and MGM-15 (dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine), without proper safety testing or warnings. The petition claims MGM-15 is approximately 15 times more potent than morphine and poses a severe risk of addiction and overdose.

State of Missouri v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC d/b/a EDP Kratom

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom)

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri

A consumer protection and public health lawsuit filed by the Missouri Attorney General alleging the unlawful manufacture and sale of products containing 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) and the synthetic derivative MGM-15 (dihydro-7-hydroxymitragynine). The suit claims these products are marketed without safety testing or regulatory approval and fail to disclose the presence of potent opioid-like compounds.

State of Missouri v. CBD American Shaman

Defendants: CBD American Shaman and affiliated companies

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri (Attorney General Catherine Hanaway)

Legal action taken to halt the sale of 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) products. The state argues that American Shaman deceptively marketed these highly potent substances as safe and natural kratom leaf alternatives while they function as hazardous opioids.

Hackett v. Bumble Bee Botanicals

Defendants: Bumble Bee Botanicals and its owners

Plaintiffs: Deshaun Hackett

Class action alleging misrepresentation of the safety of kratom and 7-OH products, failing to disclose addictive properties and withdrawal risks.

Taylor v. Mood Rite

Defendants: Mood Rite

Plaintiffs: Parents of Brendan Taylor

On May 15, 2026, the Georgia Court of Appeals upheld a summary judgment for Mood Rite, ruling the company was a product seller rather than a manufacturer and thus not subject to strict liability in a 27-year-old's death.

Devera v. Advanced Nutrition (Wyoming), LLC et al.

Defendants: Advanced Nutrition (Wyoming), LLC; American Kratom Association; and various manufacturers/distributors

Plaintiffs: Estate of Devera

A wrongful death action alleging a broad conspiracy among the American Kratom Association and various companies to illegally import and sell adulterated kratom while using complex corporate shells to avoid legal liability.

Devera v. Advanced Nutrition (Wyoming), LLC et al.

Defendants: Advanced Nutrition (Wyoming), LLC, American Kratom Association, and others

Plaintiffs: Devera

Lawsuit alleging a broad conspiracy among manufacturers, distributors, and advocacy groups to illegally import, adulterate, and sell kratom while using opaque corporate structures to evade legal liability.

State of Missouri v. Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC d/b/a EDP Kratom

Defendants: Relax Relief Rejuvenate Trading LLC (EDP Kratom), Robinson, Patel, and Gallagher

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri (Attorney General Catherine Hanaway)

The Missouri Attorney General filed a lawsuit against EDP Kratom for unlawfully manufacturing and selling high-potency kratom-derived products containing 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) and MGM-15. The lawsuit alleges the company marketed these 'hazardous opioids' without safety testing or regulatory approval and failed to disclose risks of addiction, withdrawal, and overdose. MGM-15 is highlighted as a synthetic derivative 15 times more potent than morphine.

D.O. v. 7tabz Retail, LLC

Defendants: 7tabz Retail, LLC

Plaintiffs: D.O.

An individual lawsuit (later expanded into a putative class action) alleging consumer fraud and failure to warn about the health hazards and addictive nature of 7-hydroxymitragynine products. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss in late 2025 which is currently pending.

J.C. v. Caligold Distro, Inc.

Defendants: Caligold Distro, Inc.

Plaintiffs: J.C.

This class action alleges Caligold Distro falsely marketed its 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) gummies as harmless herbal supplements. The plaintiff claims the company concealed potent opioid-like effects and addictive properties, leading to severe withdrawal symptoms for users who believed the products were safe natural alternatives.

M.L. v. Thang Botanicals and FTLS Holdings

Defendants: Thang Botanicals and FTLS Holdings

Plaintiffs: M.L. (Oregon Resident)

A class action alleging that the defendants deceptively marketed 7OHMZ tablets as safe kratom supplements while concealing extreme addiction potential and opioid-like withdrawal effects. The plaintiff claims the packaging lacked warnings about dependency similar to morphine or heroin.

Deshaun Hackett v. Bumble Bee Botanicals, et al.

Defendants: Bumble Bee Company, Bumble Bee Botanicals

Plaintiffs: Deshaun Hackett

This class action alleges that Bumble Bee Botanicals misrepresented the safety of its kratom and 7-OH products. The plaintiff claims he developed severe opioid-like withdrawal symptoms after using the products, which were marketed as natural and non-addictive.

M.L. v. Thang Botanicals, Inc. and FTLS Holdings

Defendants: Thang Botanicals, Inc. and FTLS Holdings

Plaintiffs: M.L.

Alleges deceptive marketing of 14mg 7-OH tablets. The plaintiff claims the packaging lacks warnings that the product acts on mu-opioid receptors and causes dependency similar to morphine or oxycodone.

J.U. v. Hush Worldwide, LLC, et al.

Defendants: Hush Worldwide, LLC and affiliates

Plaintiffs: J.U.

Lawsuit alleging that Hush Worldwide deceptively marketed kratom capsules and liquid shots as safe supplements while concealing their opioid-like addictive potential and failure to warn of withdrawal symptoms.

M.L. v. Thang Botanicals and FTLS Holdings

Defendants: Thang Botanicals, FTLS Holdings

Plaintiffs: M.L.

Class action alleging deceptive marketing of 14mg 7-OH tablets (7-hydroxymitragynine) as safe supplements while concealing extreme addiction potential and opioid-like withdrawal effects. The plaintiff, an Oregon resident, began using the products in 2024.

J.C. v. Caligold Distro, Inc.

Defendants: Caligold Distro, Inc.

Plaintiffs: J.C. (Recovering addict)

This lawsuit alleges that Caligold Distro falsely marketed its kratom-derived 7-OH gummies as harmless herbal supplements while concealing their potent opioid-like effects and addictive properties, leading to severe withdrawal symptoms in users.

California Department of Public Health v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc. (d/b/a Krave, Krave Kratom, Krave Botanicals)

Plaintiffs: California Department of Public Health (CDPH)

The CDPH and California Attorney General filed a legal complaint against Ashlynn Marketing Group for manufacturing and distributing adulterated and illegal kratom-derived products containing 7-OH and for interfering with a government embargo.

The People of the State of California v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc. d/b/a Krave, Krave Kratom, and/or Krave Botanicals

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Plaintiffs: California Department of Public Health and California Attorney General Rob Bonta

A civil complaint seeking an injunction and fines against the makers of Krave Kratom. The state alleges the company repeatedly violated bans on kratom and 7-OH by continuing to manufacture and distribute products even after state investigators had embargoed them, posing a significant public health risk.

California Department of Public Health v. Ashlynn Marketing Group

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group (Krave Kratom), Wasem Saliman

Plaintiffs: California Department of Public Health

California health officials filed a lawsuit against the makers of Krave Kratom for allegedly continuing to manufacture and distribute kratom products after the state had embargoed the products at their facility. The state seeks an injunction and penalties, citing the company's violation of state laws prohibiting kratom in food products.

People of the State of California v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group (d/b/a Krave Kratom)

Plaintiffs: State of California (California Department of Public Health and Attorney General Rob Bonta)

The State of California sued the manufacturer of Krave Kratom for violating state bans on kratom and its derivatives, including 7-hydroxymitragynine. The complaint alleges the company tampered with embargoed products and continued illegal distribution.

State of California v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc. (Krave Kratom)

Plaintiffs: California Department of Public Health and Attorney General Rob Bonta

California officials sued the manufacturer of Krave Kratom for continuing to manufacture and distribute kratom and 7-OH products despite state embargoes and a ban on kratom-derived products sold as food.

The People of the State of California v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Plaintiffs: State of California (Attorney General and Department of Public Health)

California health officials and the Attorney General filed a complaint against Ashlynn Marketing Group for the illegal manufacture and sale of kratom and 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) products. The lawsuit links these products to several fatal overdoses in Los Angeles County and alleges violations of state laws regarding the sale of unsafe, unapproved substances.

California Department of Public Health v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc. (d/b/a Krave, Krave Kratom, Krave Botanicals)

Plaintiffs: California Department of Public Health; California Attorney General Rob Bonta

A legal complaint seeking a court order to halt the manufacturing and distribution of kratom products, including 7-OH derivatives, which are classified as adulterated food products under California's Sherman Law. The state seeks the destruction of embargoed products and civil penalties for continued distribution.

People of the State of California v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Plaintiffs: California Attorney General and Department of Public Health

California state officials filed a complaint against the maker of Krave Botanicals for manufacturing and selling kratom and 7-OH products in violation of state law. The complaint links the products to fatal overdoses in Los Angeles County and alleges they were marketed as safe aids for pain and drug dependence despite being 'dangerous, illegal' opioids.

California Department of Public Health and Attorney General v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc. (d/b/a Krave, Krave Kratom, Krave Botanicals)

Plaintiffs: State of California (CDPH and Attorney General)

A lawsuit alleging the illegal manufacture and distribution of kratom and 7-OH food products. The state claims the company continued operations after investigators embargoed products and tampered with legal holds, violating state laws that classify kratom-derived food as adulterated and illegal for human consumption.

People of the State of California v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc. (d/b/a Krave, Krave Kratom, Krave Botanicals)

Plaintiffs: California Department of Public Health and Attorney General Rob Bonta

The State of California sued the maker of Krave Kratom for repeatedly violating a state embargo and continuing to manufacture and distribute kratom and 7-OH products. The state seeks an injunction and penalties, citing the public health risk and links to multiple overdose deaths.

People of the State of California v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc. (d/b/a Krave, Krave Kratom, Krave Botanicals)

Plaintiffs: California Department of Public Health and Attorney General Rob Bonta

A legal complaint filed against the manufacturer of Krave Kratom for repeatedly manufacturing and distributing adulterated kratom-derived products and 7-OH in violation of state public health embargoes and food safety laws.

People of the State of California v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc. (d/b/a Krave Kratom)

Plaintiffs: The People of the State of California

California Attorney General Rob Bonta and the Department of Public Health filed suit to stop the illegal manufacture and sale of kratom and 7-OH products. The state alleges the company violated health codes and public safety laws by continuing to distribute banned psychoactive substances despite prior embargos.

Unnamed Plaintiffs v. Club 13 Inc., et al.

Defendants: Club 13 Inc., The Hub Smoke Shop, Wellness Connect, OPMS Kratom

Plaintiffs: Confidential (Parents of deceased son)

A wrongful death lawsuit filed by a Kansas couple after the death of their son from kratom toxicity. The suit targets manufacturers and retailers for selling a dangerous product without adequate warnings regarding potency or lethal risks.

Doe v. Club 13 Inc., et al.

Defendants: Club 13 Inc., The Hub Smoke Shop, Wellness Connect, OPMS Kratom

Plaintiffs: Confidential Plaintiffs (Parents of the Deceased)

A lawsuit was filed by the parents of a man who died from kratom toxicity, naming several manufacturers and retailers including Club 13 and OPMS. The complaint alleges the defendants sold a dangerous product without adequate warnings about its potency and potential for fatal overdose.

Doe v. Club 13 Inc. et al.

Defendants: Club 13 Inc., The Hub Smoke Shop, Wellness Connect, and OPMS Kratom

Plaintiffs: The family/parents of the deceased son

A Kansas couple filed a wrongful death lawsuit following the death of their son, alleging that the defendants sold dangerous kratom products without proper warnings about their potentially lethal risks and addictive properties.

Hornsby v. Club 13 Inc. et al.

Defendants: Club 13 Inc., The Hub Smoke Shop, Wellness Connect, and OPMS Kratom

Plaintiffs: Hornsby family

A wrongful death lawsuit filed by a Kansas couple following the death of their son from a kratom overdose. The suit alleges the defendants sold a dangerous product without proper warnings or dosing instructions.

Doe v. Kratom Manufacturers

Defendants: Unnamed Kratom Manufacturers and Retailers

Plaintiffs: Confidential Kansas Couple

A lawsuit filed by a Kansas couple following the death of their son from kratom-related complications. The case follows legislative moves in Kansas to ban 7-OH products due to safety concerns and misleading health claims by manufacturers.

In re: Club 13 Inc., OPMS Kratom, et al.

Defendants: Club 13 Inc., The Hub Smoke Shop, Wellness Connect, and OPMS Kratom

Plaintiffs: Unnamed Kansas parents

A wrongful death lawsuit filed by a Kansas couple following the death of their son. The plaintiffs allege the defendants sold dangerous, concentrated kratom products without adequate warnings regarding the risk of overdose, addiction, or lethal interactions.

Faker et al. v. The Hub Smoke Shop, Wellness Connect, Club 13, and Remarkable Herbs

Defendants: The Hub Smoke Shop, Wellness Connect, Club 13, Remarkable Herbs

Plaintiffs: Faker family (Parents of the deceased)

A wrongful death lawsuit filed after a 34-year-old Kansas City man died of a kratom overdose. The suit alleges the retailers falsely claimed the product was '100% safe' and failed to provide any warning labels regarding the risks of 7-OH or mitragynine toxicity.

Doe v. Club 13 Inc., et al.

Defendants: Club 13 Inc., The Hub Smoke Shop, Wellness Connect, and OPMS Kratom

Plaintiffs: Confidential Plaintiffs (Parents of the deceased)

A lawsuit filed following the death of a young man, alleging that the defendants sold dangerous, high-potency kratom extracts without proper safety warnings or instructions, leading to a fatal overdose.

J.J. et al v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.

Defendants: Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc. (d/b/a Krave Kratom)

Plaintiffs: J.J., C.D., C.B., and D.F. (pseudonymous individuals)

Consolidated class action complaint alleging the manufacturer failed to warn consumers of the potentially addictive nature of its kratom-based products.

State of Missouri v. CBD American Shaman

Defendants: CBD American Shaman

Plaintiffs: State of Missouri

Missouri's Attorney General initiated legal action to halt the sale of 7-OH products by CBD American Shaman, alleging the company misled consumers about the contents and safety of the potent kratom derivative, citing risks of addiction and hospitalization.